Table of Contents:
When the Washington Post reporter Michael Weisskopf dismissed evangelical Christians as ‚Äúlargely poor, uneducated, and easy to command,‚ÄĚ ombudsman Joann Byrd reported: ‚ÄúHundreds of callers offered proof that they don‚Äôt fit the description. One man said there was a Jaguar parked in his driveway; people revealed their incomes in detail normally reserved for a Form 1040. A woman ran through the degrees of the six people living under her roof: two PhDs and another on the way, three master‚Äôs degrees. A Florida man said that in his ‚Äėmultimillion-dollar business, none of my employees commands me.‚Äô‚ÄĚ
Byrd wrote ‚ÄúThe simplistic Journalism 101 answer: Go back through a story and challenge every sentence for its factual basis.‚ÄĚ
If the Post quickly apologized for Weisskopf‚Äôs snide ‚Äúeasy to command‚ÄĚ verbiage, why does this long-standing journalistic disresepect for religion continue? Is it a ‚Äúfact‚ÄĚ that Republicans want to install theocracy and repeal the First Amendment? Is it a ‚Äúfact‚ÄĚ that abortion providers or gay people are killed by a ‚Äúclimate‚ÄĚ inspired by the Bible? Reporters have a nasty tendency to uncork attacks on religion that are short on documentation and long on editorializing.