1/31/2012 4:03 PM ET
Did the Times learn nothing about rushing to judgement from its Duke lacrosse "rape" hoax debacle? Even as the case fell apart, the Times issued a now-notorious, error-riddled 5,000-word story ...
9/19/2007 2:12 PM ET
Why did the Times believe in the Duke rape hoax so long? "[David] Brooks' brand of conservatism - so moderate that he rooted for the Democrats to win control of Congress in 2006 - still put him ...
9/4/2007 12:00 AM ET
Chris Cuomo: Be careful what you hear from the media.
7/25/2007 10:09 AM ET
Executive Editor Bill Keller says criticism of his paper's coverage of the Duke lacrosse case has "in some instances been unfair to the point of hysteria." But former Public Editor Daniel Okrent ...
7/23/2007 9:46 AM ET
Faced with a black athlete as a suspect and an alleged rape victim who is white, the Times displays a concern for "racial overtones" totally absent in its shoddy coverage of the Duke lacrosse ...
7/13/2007 12:00 PM ET
No sexism among American Indian lacrosse players, just those from Duke?
6/20/2007 12:00 AM ET
Duke DA Mike Nifong should face criminal charges.
5/14/2007 3:01 PM ET
Public Editor Barney Calame gets a chilly send-off - five letters criticizing the Times' slanted coverage of phony rape allegations against the Duke lacrosse team.
4/16/2007 12:08 PM ET
Was sports columnist Selena Roberts listening?
4/12/2007 2:11 PM ET
The Times leads with the exoneration of the Duke lacrosse players - after a year's worth of misleading coverage.