The Times' didn't mention the Democratic affiliation of controversy-plagued Connecticut Attorney General and U.S. Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal until paragraph three of its expose. By contrast, the Times devoted a headline and lead sentence to the news that womanizing Rep. Mark Souder was a Republican.
By
Clay Waters
May 19, 2010 - 9:49am
The paper can't be accused of underplaying the story, with a front-page splash Tuesday, although the print headline over Raymond Hernandez's expose was deadening: "Candidate's Words Differ From His History [1]." The photo caption didn't identify Blumenthal as a Democrat either, merely as "Attorney General Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut."
Compare the Blumenthal case to another politician's personal scandal, one involving a Republican: Indiana Rep. Mark Souder confession of an affair with a staffer and subsequent resignation from office.
While Hernandez bided his time until paragraph three to reveal Blumenthal was a Democrat, congressional reporter Carl Hulse immediately informed readers of Souder's "conservative Republican" affiliation. The headline also outed Souder as GOP: "Citing Affair, Republican Gives Up House Seat [2]."
Hulse's lead sentence:
Representative Mark Souder, a conservative Republican from Indiana, on Tuesday acknowledged carrying on an affair with a staff member and said he would resign his seat in Congress as of Friday.You can follow Times Watch on Twitter [3].