Now that environmentalists and the media have succeeded to getting polar bears – the global warming mascot of the northern hemisphere – listed as a “threatened species,” now they’re turning their eyes to another creature: the penguin.
“World News with Charles Gibson” promoted a new study that found a decline in the penguin population on its July 1 broadcast. ABC correspondent Ned Potter described the penguin populace as a barometer of the Earth’s health. “World News” left out the potential good news about penguins and other research that argues sea ice is not exactly disappearing.
“Penguins have very little to do with canaries,” said Potter. “But today, they’re being called canaries in the coal mine – animals whose health is a signal about the health of the world.”
According to the study’s author,
“[I]n the Antarctic, Boersma says they are threatened by climate change,” Potter said. “Off
“As their life support is dwindling, our life support is dwindling too,” Sybille Klenzendorf of the environmental group World Wildlife Fund told “World News.”
“There’s good news and there’s bad news,” Jenn Pennycook of Penguinscience.com explained to CBS correspondent John Blackstone . “With the breakup of the sea ice, it makes many more places accessible for the penguins to build their nest, but it also reduces the number of places because the ice is so small that they can’t live on it anymore.”
Claims that dwindling sea ice is causing the penguins’ demise may also be inaccurate, though “World News” didn’t mention it. In April 2008, scientist Steve McIntyre showed sea ice levels  in the Southern Hemisphere are at 25-year highs.
“On a global basis, world sea ice in April 2008 reached levels that were ‘unprecedented’ for the month of April in over 25 years,” Steve McIntyre wrote on Climateaudit.org on May 4 . “Levels are the third highest (for April) since the commencement of records in 1979, exceeded only by levels in 1979 and 1982.”
McIntyre, along with Ross McKitrick, debunked the validity of the infamous “hockey stick” graph  used in a journal article by Michael Mann, which described the increase in Northern Hemisphere mean temperature. The two claimed Mann’s graph was based on flawed calculations and data defects.