Emerging Anti-Tea Party Line: Lack of Opposition to Arizona Proves Racism and Hypocrisy
Comments on two Sunday shows reflected an emerging new liberal line
of reasoning, which uses the lack of opposition to Arizona’s new
immigration enforcement law, as a means to discredit conservatives and
Tea Party activists as hypocrites and/or racists. HBO’s Bill Maher on
ABC’s This Week:
Government intrusion, government power is something
that really bothers conservatives, unless it's directed toward people
who aren't white, you know, I mean it does seem like there’s some of
that going on there.
Chrystia Freeland of Reuters on the McLaughlin Group:
What I think is really important to notice here is
the hypocrisy, the intellectual hypocrisy because we have...a lot of
the same people who are very exercised right now...about big government
and pointing out the American tradition of liberty, of individual
rights, are also the people who are on the side of allowing the
government to intrude much more into individuals' lives on immigration.
There’s nothing insistent, however, since while some conservatives do
oppose the Arizona law (host Jake Tapper quoted Virginia Governor Bob
McDonnell, for example) conservatives aren’t against all government
authority; they just think it should be limited to that delineated in
the Constitution – and that would include defense of the borders and a
recognition those here illegally should not enjoy the same rights as
those who are citizens.
Maher, regurgitating a line from his HBO show, soon slimed
Republicans as racists when it is liberals and Democrats who advocate a
racial spoils system and race-based college admission policies (and as
Maher spoke he was sitting beside long-time race hustler Al Sharpton):
I would never say, and I have never said because it’s
not true, that Republicans, all Republicans are racist. That would be
silly and wrong. But nowadays, if you are racist you're probably a
Republican. [scoffing laughter from Matthew Dowd and George Will]
That is quite different.
(Earlier in the show, Tapper asked Secretary of the Interior Ken
Salazar, who was on to discuss the oil spill: “Your family has been in
this country since the 1500s, from Spain originally, I believe.
Do
you worry that as a Hispanic-American that if you went to Arizona you
might be racially-profiled because of this law?”)
The reasoning from Freeland, formerly of the Financial
Times, in full (and gives me space to place a screen shot of her):
What I think is really important to notice here is the
hypocrisy, the intellectual hypocrisy because we have, as Eleanor
[Clift] was pointing out, a lot of the same people who are very
exercised right now – I think quite rightly about big government and
pointing out the American tradition of liberty, of individual rights –
are also the people who are on the side of allowing the government to
intrude much more into individuals' lives on immigration.
— Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at
the Media Research Center. Click
here to follow him on Twitter.