HDNet's Dan Rather, in a piece for the Huffington Post, apologized
for his use of the word "watermelons" during a segment about Barack
Obama's ability to pass health care, that was aired on the
March 8 Chris Matthews Show.
In his explanation Rather offers his Texas background as an excuse
saying, "I used the analogy of selling watermelons by the side of the
road. It's an expression that stretches to my boyhood roots in
Southeast Texas" but then goes on to plead "I'm sorry people took
offense."
The following is the most relevant portion of the statement, from
the former CBS Evening News anchor, as it appears in The Huffington
Post:
I was talking about Obama and health care and I used the
analogy of selling watermelons by the side of the road. It's an
expression that stretches to my boyhood roots in Southeast Texas, when
country highways were lined with stands manned by sellers of all races.
Now of course watermelons have become a stereotype for African
Americans and so my analogy entered a charged environment. I'm sorry
people took offense.
But anyone who knows me personally or knows my professional career
would know that race was not on my mind. Reporting on the injustices of
race was part of the reason I became a reporter. I grew up in
segregated Texas on the same side of the tracks as the African American
community. At the time, enlightened people called them Negros. Many
people called them much worse. When I covered the Civil Rights
movement, I saw sheer hatred in ways that still haunt and shock me. For
doing my small part in reporting on the South in the 1960s, I was
called a traitor to my roots and other names not fit for print. I was
threatened with death by people who would have welcomed me to their
church on Sunday on account of my white skin if they didn't know what I
was there to do. I do not take this issue lightly.
I can understand why someone who just happened upon my comments
could take offense or want clarification. But what has caused this
comment to "go viral" is the trumpeting of an online and cable echo
chamber that claims the banner of news but trades in gossip, gotcha,
and innuendo. Furthermore, even for those who brook no prejudice, when
everything is condensed to 140 characters or a small YouTube clip, many
people who got this "news" did so without any context, just a headline
that popped up on their phone or inbox.
For the full piece visit
The Huffington Post.
- Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.