CyberAlert - 11/24/2000 - Pro-Gore Court Decision Hailed
Published: 11/24/2000 1:00 AM ET
|
Pro-Gore Court Decision Hailed; Standing O for Harris Distorted; Katherine "Cruella de Vil" Harris; Peggy Noonan for President? |
The
Florida Supreme Court ruling announced Tuesday night in which the
justices, appointed by Democratic Governors, decided to ignore the state
statues and create their own new vote counting deadline of Sunday night,
earned approval in some media quarters.
- ABC News. During an ABC News special report about
the ruling just before 10pm ET Tuesday night, November 21, ABC's Gore
beat reporter Terry Moran assured viewers:
"Before people
say, 'oh, the Democratic Supreme Court of Florida awarded victory to the
Democratic candidate,' they should go back into the law books and see
that Florida, like most states, has a long history of saying the most
important value in an election is to count the votes that were
legitimately cast."
- Boston Globe. In a November 22 front page "news analysis," Boston Globe Washington Bureau Chief David Shribman, a veteran of the Wall Street Journal reporting staff, celebrated the court's activist decision. "Every voice matters, the justices remind us," declared the headline over the piece in which he rejoiced at how the court decided the voters must be primary and "if that means counting every last ballot card, that is both the burden and the glory of democratic rule." Here's an excerpt of what Shribman contended:
For drama and decisiveness, the moment had few equals.
Late at night, with Thanksgiving nearing and with the political impasse moving into its third week, the Florida Supreme Court stepped into the election struggle, throwing the battle for the presidency into upheaval with the simple revolutionary thought that created the country two centuries ago and could eventually bring the 2000 campaign to an end: The merest individual voice matters.
Huge political armies continue to clash in the capital and in Florida, but the decision of the state's highest court seeks to assure that the relatively few anonymous voters whose views were missed by machine count - but whose intent may be discerned by the human eye - will be considered in the final count. In the hands of those anonymous few rest the destinies of Governor George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore....
The theory behind the court's action was clear, and was anything but the sterile product of an isolated court. Ruling in the most fevered political atmosphere of the age, with control of the White House in the balance, the court gave every indication of having followed this dispute and all of its curious, even maddening, turns.
In that context, it said that a political campaign so close that the margins were microscopic must ultimately be decided the way even the most lopsided elections are decided, by the voters. And, the court ruled, if that means counting every last ballot card, that is both the burden and the glory of democratic rule.
The court established that, as great as the institutions of government are, the individual is greater still, and his or her voice must be heard - and counted.
And so the counting will go on, through the holiday weekend. No presidential election in modern times has lasted so long, or prompted so many legal battles, or rewarded and then punished the participants with such swiftness. But, then again, no election has so unambiguously affirmed the founding principles of the nation, especially the primacy, the prerogatives and, ultimately, the power of the individual.
END Excerpt
To read Shribman's entire "news
analysis," go to:
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/327/nation/Every_voice_matters_the_justices_
remind_us+.shtml
During
the 1am ET hour on MSNBC the night of the Florida Supreme Court ruling,
Newsweek's Jonathan Alter used the decision as an opportunity to
denounce Republicans for trying to "snow us" in how they argued
machine counts are more accurate.
In my absence from the MRC on Wednesday, Rich Noyes
rewound a tape a few hours to track down the early morning blast:
"The real Republican
problem has been their legal strategy. They started out with a losing
strategy, a political and legal strategy that stressed the machine count.
They actually thought that they were going to get all of us to believe
that machine counts all around the United States were the last authority,
when on the books in states all over the country they have these hand
counts. And they thought they could snow us with these machines, and it
didn't work."
ABC's
Diane Sawyer used a flashlight Wednesday morning to try to see a
"dimpled chad," but when she couldn't, instead of saying
her failure demonstrated how inaccurate such counting must be, she
praised Florida hand counters for their "phenomenal work."
Her reaction fueled a Campaign 2000 Media Reality Check "Quick
Take" from the Media Research Center, produced by Rich Noyes and
Tim Graham.
To read it online with an accompanying
RealPlayer video clip posted by MRC Webmaster Andy Szul, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/realitycheck/2000/20001122.asp
To see the Media Reality Check in the format in
which it was distributed by fax, access the Adobe Acrobat PDF version:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/realitycheck/2000/pdf/qt1122.pdf
Here's the text of the November 22 report:
ABC'S DIANE SAWYER CAN'T SPOT NON-VOTES, BUT PRAISES THOSE WHO CAN FLORIDA DIMPLE-SPOTTERS ARE DOING "PHENOMENAL WORK"
Racing through the numerical options for a Gore victory this morning, ABC's Political Analyst George Stephanopoulos announced on Wednesday's Good Morning America that his Democratic sources estimate that if a "looser standard" of counting votes is allowed in Florida, Al Gore would finally achieve a lead of a couple of hundred votes.
How loose is loose? The Democrats want "dimpled" ballots, or punch cards that have been neither punched nor perforated but which have a barely-detectable dent near what would be the right hole, added to Gore's count so that he, not Bush, would be President.
After Stephanopoulos's arithmetic display, viewers saw co-host Diane Sawyer hold up a punch card ballot that she said was dimpled. "I'm holding this because I've been obsessed with what it is to see an actual ballot with a dimple in it and it is a very subtle thing," Sawyer said. "And we, I don't think, I've been putting flashlights through it," at which point she aimed a flashlight beam through the paper, revealing no obvious holes or marks. "I'm telling you the people doing this work are really doing phenomenal work to see all of this and to take care over all of these," she added.
Her co-host, Charles Gibson, remarked that "It's just a slight indentation in that in that uh, in that card." Sawyer hastened to add that "If you didn't see it [the dimple] at home that's because it's really hard for you to see."
Gibson agreed: "And they're not hitting it with a pen so that you see an ink point, they're hitting it with a stylus so you just have to look for an indentation."
Sawyer: "That's right."
Moments later, when Gibson interviewed Gore chief William Daley, he failed to challenge him to defend the Gore camp's insistence that such unreliable marks be counted as votes. Instead, he tossed a softball about last night's ruling from the Florida Supreme Court: "Did you expect this much of a victory from the court?"
END Reprint of Media Reality Check "Quick Take"
Al
Gore "scored on the PR front" by suggesting he and Bush
meet, Newsweek's Jonathan Alter asserted on Wednesday's Today, as
he argued "it's important for them to appear together publicly to
reassure the country and the world that we have a stable
democracy." But in the same segment, MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens
observed, Chris Matthews advised: "If I were Bush I'd never meet
with him because it would be like a Mob meeting. It's like who's gonna
handle security and what's gonna be the trap? There will be a
trap." An appalled Alter fired back in Gore's defense:
"The Vice President is not a terrorist!"
In the November 22 segment with Katie Couric,
Alter asserted: "I also think
that Gore scored on the PR front by suggesting again that the two men
meet. You got financial markets that are getting jittery. The American
public is getting concerned about this."
Couric:
"But you yourself say nothing very good would come from that
meeting but Gore looks good suggesting it."
Alter: "The
meeting itself is not important. They would just, it would be very
frosty between the two of them. But it's important for them to appear
together publicly to reassure the country and the world that we have a
stable democracy. And just say look we disagree about this. We
disagree about the law but we agree that we have a democracy that
still works. That would-"
Couric:
"Okay. Do you think we're gonna see a Gore-Bush public
appearance?"
Matthews:
"I'd never meet. If I were Bush I'd never meet with him because
it would be like a Mob meeting. It's like who's gonna handle security
and what's gonna be the trap? There will be a trap."
Alter: "The
Vice President is not a terrorist!"
Matthews:
"Gore's people will put out the word that they're gonna agree on
something about no further litigation and then all of a sudden Gore,
Bush has to come out and face the cameras and say, 'Didya make the
deal? Didya make the deal?' Because they'd leak what they are going to
put out at the meeting. I wouldn't trust the other guy in politics,
ever."
Couric:
"Alright that's got to be the last word. Alright, trust no one in
politics! The last word from Chris Matthews."
More like the Bush campaign should trust no one in the media.
Even
in a moment of triumph, Katherine Harris couldn't get a break from
ABC, CBS or NBC. During a special joint session of the Florida House
and Senate Tuesday to swear in new members, she received a standing
ovation from nearly all in the chamber.
But Tuesday night, the MRC's Tim Graham and Brian Boyd determined for me, the NBC Nightly News didn't show the event while on the November 21 CBS Evening News Byron Pitts asserted that only "state Republicans" gave her "a hero's welcome." ABC's Peter Jennings acknowledged she "got a standing ovation in the legislature today from members of both parties," but he dismissed any affirmation of her work, attributing it to "perhaps having to do with state pride."
- CBS Evening News. Over video of the standing ovation, Byron Pitts reported: "Today the only public judgment came from state Republicans as they gave Secretary of State Harris a hero's welcome, she's the one player most often vilified by Democrats."
- ABC's World News Tonight allowed viewers to hear the applause as anchor Peter Jennings explained: "Just one other note from Tallahassee. Perhaps having to do with state pride, the Florida Secretary of State, Katherine Harris, got a standing ovation in the legislature today from members of both parties. She was there for the swearing-in of new legislators."
A
new harangue about Katherine Harris and a previous one denounced. In
this week's Time magazine, the MRC's Tim Graham observed, Margaret
Carlson argued that Harris "mixed the pious certitude of Linda
Tripp with the hauteur of a Dynasty protagonist." Carlson added
this insult: "Harris, often compared to Cruella de Vil, snatching
ballots rather than puppies, was briefly the most powerful woman on
the planet."
The Washington Post Ombudsman this week denounced a reporter for issuing a personal attack on Harris. Fashion reporter Robin Givhan had denigrated Harris: "One wonders how this Republican woman, who can't even use restraint when she's wielding a mascara wand, will manage to use it and make sound decisions in this game of partisan one-upmanship."
- Margaret Carlson in the November 27 Time. On
a page which included Harris's head, with deranged red cartoon eyes,
posted on the cartoon of Cruella DeVil, Carlson opined:
"The only
person who looks like a character from one of the more usual cable
dramas is Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, a Bush campaign
co-chairwoman who mixed the pious certitude of Linda Tripp with the
hauteur of a Dynasty protagonist. She once performed in a Sarasota
nightclub, getting audience members to join her in flapping their arms
to music in a peculiar art form called chicken dancing. Until the
Florida Supreme Court enjoined her from certifying the vote, Harris,
often compared to Cruella de Vil, snatching ballots rather than
puppies, was briefly the most powerful woman on the planet.
"To grasp
the enormity of what Harris was up to, imagine James Carville as a
political appointee of Governor Roger Clinton's, deciding to shut down
a legal recount of an election with a 300-vote margin and award the
victory to Roger's brother Bill."
As Tim Graham pointed out, Harris is not a "political appointee," but a public servant elected through the "will of the people."
After detailing Republican jokes about hand
counting, Carlson rebutted:
"What's
fraudulent is the very notion that one side's political operative
could singlehandedly decide a disputed election. If this were a horror
movie, the audience would be mentally shouting 'Stop this woman! Call
the authorities!'"
To read Carlson's complete diatribe, go to:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,88796,00.html
- Washington Post. In his inaugural column, new Post Ombudsman Michael Getler on Wednesday criticized the personal nature of an attack on Harris by a Post reporter. An excerpt of his November 22 column, titled "Mascara Smear."
"At this moment that so desperately needs diplomacy, understatement and calm, one wonders how this Republican woman, who can't even use restraint when she's wielding a mascara wand, will manage to use it and make sound decisions in this game of partisan one-upmanship."
That sentence appeared on the front page of the Style section last Saturday in an article by Post fashion reporter Robin Givhan about Florida's secretary of state, Katherine Harris.
I would paraphrase that sentence: "At this moment that so desperately needs diplomacy, understatement and calm, one wonders" how The Post could publish such a slashing attack on the personal appearance of a woman who has been an important figure in the electoral stalemate.
In case you missed it, here are excerpts from what Ms. Givhan told us about Ms. Harris: "Her skin had been plastered and powdered to the texture of pre-war walls....[S]he looked as if she were wearing a mask....The American public doesn't like falsehoods, and Harris is clearly presenting herself in a fake manner....Why should anyone trust her?"
Ms. Givhan's treatment of Ms. Harris, in the view many Post readers - including the ombudsman - was a classic example of the arrogance of journalists that undermines people's confidence in the media.
During this extraordinary period, The Post has been bombarded by e-mails and phone calls about alleged bias. Mostly, callers express partisan opinions without citing specific stories. But the Harris article produced a different and, in my view, more serious, specific and useful reaction for the paper to ponder.
Mocking someone's appearance is not something that newspapers should do....
Eugene Robinson, Style editor, says he had no idea the story would provoke the reaction it did. "Part of what a Style section ought to do is kick up a bunch of dust from time to time. But just because there is a big reaction to this story doesn't mean that we wanted this....Maybe we were a little deaf to the tone in this case," he says....
The stakes for The Post on a story such as this are high. Its reporting and analysis of the presidential standoff have lived up to the paper's well-earned reputation for top-notch coverage. Yet that reputation can get tarnished by such a high-readability story that can add fuel to those who believe, or suspect, that the paper is inherently biased.
END Excerpt
To read Getler's entire piece, including a
defense from Givhan, go to:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49904-2000Nov21.html
The
November 21 edition of MediaNomics by Rich Noyes, Director of the
MRC's Free Market Project:
- Economic Freedom Is Overlooked Concept At Broadcast Networks
Economic freedom
is closely correlated with both the wealth of a nation and the ability
of its people to enjoy satisfying livelihoods. But none of the three
broadcast networks reported the findings of this year's
country-by-country survey of economic freedom,
released jointly by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street
Journal on November 1. More troubling, the concept of economic freedom
has been virtually excluded from the networks' news agendas this
year, even as their heavy coverage of the presidential campaign
spotlighted tax and regulatory proposals which would affect
Americans' economic freedom....
To read the whole article, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/medianomics/2000/mn20001121.asp
- Kudos...to U.S. News & World Report
None of the
broadcast networks took time from their ongoing coverage of the
Florida re-count to tell viewers that the lame duck Clinton
administration had pushed through new workplace rules that could cost
employers up to $126 billion a year. Yet despite all of the political
news, the November 27 edition of U.S. News & World Report
successfully included a report by Kim Clark explaining why the
business community has objected so strenuously to the new rules....
To read the rest of the article, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/medianomics/2000/kd20001121.asp
Two
ABC on-air personnel agreed Peggy Noonan would make the best
President, with one admitting she gives him "goose bumps."
Naturally, they aren't with the news division but with ABC Sports.
MRC entertainment analyst Tom Johnson alerted
CyberAlert to the comments made during ABC's Monday Night Football
game this week. Returning from an ad break during the 4th quarter, the
ABC camera focused on a poster urging people to vote which featured a
picture ABC football commentator Dennis Miller and proclaimed:
"Dennis, You Decide." Miller commented: "Well, if
it's up to me I'd pick Peggy Noonan."
Play-by-play
announcer Al Michaels responded: "That gave me goose bumps."
Miller asked:
"You like Peggy's writing, huh?"
Michaels gushed
about her columns in the Wall Street Journal, though he dropped the
word Journal: "I read the Wall Street editorial page, I get goose
bumps."
Too bad Al Michaels isn't in contention to anchor World News Tonight. Reading the Wall Street Journal editorial page is probably a practice few at ABC News follow. - Brent Baker
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers:
https://secure.mediaresearch.org/Donation/Order/MediaResearch25-27/mck-cgi/cybdonate.asp
>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com. Or, you can go to:
http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/cybersub.html.
Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE
REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com."
After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply
hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been
added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page
link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You
DO
NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to
CyberAlert.
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-unsubscribe@topica.com.
Send problems and comments to: cyber@mediaresearch.org.
>>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: MRCWeb_site_News-subscribe@topica.com.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/mrcwebnews.html.<<<
