Obama Wants More Regulation, But Experts Beg To Differ
Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama has proposed a solution to the subprime problem and its affect on the stock market – more regulation.
“The implosion of the subprime lending industry is more than a temporary blip in our economic progress. It is a cancer that, given today’s integrated financial markets, threatens to spread with devastating impact to housing and to our economy as a whole, unless we act to contain it,” wrote Obama on the Financial Times Web site August 29.
What exactly does he want to contain? Obama wants to regulate and fine what he called “the unlicensed, unregulated, fly-by-night mortgage brokers who are hoodwinking low-income borrowers.” Aren’t those lenders being punished already with thousands of layoffs and dozens of mortgage companies going bankrupt?
“Lenders who are losing jobs, business, volume, are being fined by the marketplace every day since the mistaken loans were put out and that’s exactly how capitalism works. It doesn’t wait around for a government body to act,” said William Beach the director of the Center for Data Analysis at the Heritage Foundation.
Beach asked, “When Countrywide is on the verge of going out of business, and that’s the nation’s largest mortgage company, what more do you want?”
Free markets allow companies to prosper greatly and punish them ruthlessly when they fail. The most brutal thing that can happen to a company is for it to go out of business. All regulation would do is insulate companies from this harsh punishment the markets will provide to “unscrupulous” (as Obama put it) lenders.
Obama advocated “enact[ing] the regulatory and disclosure laws that the mortgage industry has been lobbying against.” While Obama supported government intervention, Beach warned that more regulation is not the solution.
“If we get government in it [the mortgage markets] what will happen is the financial industry, which almost always influences the regulatory bodies and helps them write the regulations, will protect themselves from the ruthless, fierce and tenacious disciplining actions of the marketplace. I just think that’s the worst way to discipline people; allow a regulatory body to write the rules,” concluded Beach.
Alex Pollock, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told BMI that one of the reasons for the subprime problem was that buyers didn’t realize what they were getting into, but it is better “to equip the customers to actually know what is going on and therefore protect themselves,” than to create more regulation.
It has become quite obvious what side the media has taken on this issue. They are constantly talking about predatory lending, and presenting borrowers as the victim instead of placing equal blame on all parties involved. While economists tend to disagree on ways to solve the problems with the markets, the one thing they do tend to agree on is that the government should stay out.