Appearance Alert
MRC's Bozell to appear on FNC's 'Kelly File' at 9:40pm ET

NYT Still Late to the 'Party' When It Comes to Identifying Scandal-Plagued Dems

The Times' didn't mention the Democratic affiliation of controversy-plagued Connecticut Attorney General and U.S. Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal until paragraph three of its expose. By contrast, the Times devoted a headline and lead sentence to the news that womanizing Rep. Mark Souder was a Republican.

With a little help from his Republican rival, the Times broke the story of Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal falsely suggesting over the years to have served in Vietnam. He'd actually racked up several deferments and had only finagled a stateside slot in the Marine Reserve when his last deferment came into jeopardy.

The paper can't be accused of underplaying the story, with a front-page splash Tuesday, although the print headline over Raymond Hernandez's expose was deadening: "Candidate's Words Differ From His History." The photo caption didn't identify Blumenthal as a Democrat either, merely as "Attorney General Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut."

Compare the Blumenthal case to another politician's personal scandal, one involving a Republican: Indiana Rep. Mark Souder confession of an affair with a staffer and subsequent resignation from office.

While Hernandez bided his time until paragraph three to reveal Blumenthal was a Democrat, congressional reporter Carl Hulse immediately informed readers of Souder's "conservative Republican" affiliation. The headline also outed Souder as GOP: "Citing Affair, Republican Gives Up House Seat."

Hulse's lead sentence:

Representative Mark Souder, a conservative Republican from Indiana, on Tuesday acknowledged carrying on an affair with a staff member and said he would resign his seat in Congress as of Friday.

You can follow Times Watch on Twitter.