The Cost of Killing Palinzilla
The monster springs suddenly, without warning, from the frigid depths of the
The people scatter, screaming in terror. All, that is, but the intrepid stringer for an out-of-town newspaper, who phones his editor with a desperate message: “Call out the Army, the Navy, the Air Force! We must use every weapon at our disposal to destroy this minion of Hell before it kills us all!”
No, it's not the latest send-up of Godzilla. It's the liberal media reaction to the woman who has put Barack Obama's coronation in jeopardy, Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin.
The liberal media have been boosting Obama like the king's courtiers, their bias so obvious that even Saturday Night Live started poking fun at them months ago. More recently, on August 25, shortly before GOP presidential nominee McCain selected Palin to be his running mate, CNN's Lou Dobbs took his fellow journalists to task: “My colleagues in the national media are absolutely biased, in the tank supporting the Obama candidacy while claiming the mantle of objectivity.”
For more than a week now, Big Media has been serving Obama by training every weapon in its arsenal on the
In their zeal to cripple Palin, the media are betraying some of the principles they claim to cherish the most. Aren't muckraking reporters supposed to appreciate reformers willing to upset their own party's applecart, as Palin did to the corrupt Alaska GOP? Aren't idealistic scribes supposed to admire commitment to moral values and sacrificial strength of character, as Palin has shown by bringing her Down syndrome baby to term, and by forgiving and supporting her pregnant daughter? And whatever happened to feminism? Who'd have expected to see liberal journalists attacking a successful woman for having both a career and a family?
Apparently, for the liberal media, partisanship outweighs principles and character.
If you think the media are over the top in their hostility to Palin, you're not alone. Even some members of the media agree.
On NBC's Morning Joe, leftie co-host Mika Brzezinski critiqued a Wall Street Journal column, “Let's Talk About Palin's Family Challenges,” written by BBC reporter Katty Kay and ABC News reporter Claire Shipman. Brzezinski: “This is an argument Joe [co-host Joe Scarborough] and I have about fairness and whether or not there [is] some sort of underlying unfairness when it comes to Republicans. And I just, you know, I feel it here.”
Bay Buchanan lit into CNN's Campbell Brown for pushing a fantastic story about Palin's supposedly scandalous sale of a luxury jet purchased by her predecessor, former Alaska Gov. Frank Murkowski. Even CNN commentator Paul Begala, a former aide to Bill Clinton, agreed, there's no scandal there.
The public may be getting fed up with the liberal media lashing out at Palin. The tabloid mag Us Weekly reportedly has paid the biggest direct price, losing thousands of subscribers after running a Palin-bashing cover with the headline “Babies, Lies & Scandal.”
The liberal media as a whole may be paying a greater price: loss of credibility. A Rasmussen Reports poll finds that 51 percent of
Rasmussen has even more bad news for the liberal media. According to the polling firm, 68 percent of voters “now believe most reporters try to help the candidate they want to win,” and 55 percent say “media bias is a bigger problem for the electoral process than large campaign donations.”
New York Times Public Editor Clark Hoyt is defending the media coverage of Palin: “Intense, independent scrutiny by The Times and the rest of the news media of Palin's background, character and record was inevitable and right.” Hoyt is partly correct.
Yes, the media ought to be investigating Palin's background, character, and record. But they ought to be investigating Barack Obama and Joe Biden, too. Here's where the loss of credibility comes in: The liberal media don't investigate liberal politicians with anything like the zeal they apply to conservatives. If Hoyt could persuade his colleagues in the media to give fair and equal treatment to Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, religious and secular, the profession's reputation and audience might stop slipping away.